Data cannot reach AI safely
Papers, SOPs, notes, images, and analysis results are fragmented without retrieval and evidence design.
AI for Science implementation support
We help life science, pharmaceutical, and medical research teams design generative AI, RAG, local LLMs, AI agents, and research data foundations from PoC to department operation.
The service is designed around human review, access control, explainability, and reproducibility.
We validate search, summarization, analysis support, report drafts, and team knowledge workflows through PoC.
Model selection alone is not enough. Research AI breaks down when data, permissions, evaluation, and operations are disconnected.
Papers, SOPs, notes, images, and analysis results are fragmented without retrieval and evidence design.
Teams lack criteria for correctness, reproducibility, review, and production readiness.
Confidential data, access control, audit logs, and external LLM boundaries are not defined early enough.
Chat remains isolated from analysis, reporting, approval, and education workflows.
We design AI objectives, data foundations, agent workflows, PoC evaluation, production operations, and training with research teams.
Design retrieval, citations, permissions, and update rules for papers, SOPs, notes, logs, and metadata.
Create human-reviewed workflows for search, analysis support, review requests, and report drafts.
Compare external LLMs, private RAG, and local LLMs according to security and network constraints.
Prepare usage rules, review perspectives, prompt standards, evaluation logs, and department training.
We separate data, knowledge, models, agents, and department operations before scaling AI usage.
Papers, SOPs, notes, images, NGS, mass spectrometry, flow cytometry, and analysis results
Search, vector database, citations, permissions, update rules, and evaluation sets
External LLMs, local LLMs, specialist models, prompts, and guardrails
Research, summarization, analysis support, reports, review requests, and tool integration
Human review, audit logs, training, usage rules, PoC evaluation, and improvement
We support assessment, design, PoC, production, and training as separate stages.
Research leaders and research DX teams
Use cases, data and permission inventory, PoC plan
Human decision on priority and feasibility
Teams using papers, SOPs, and notes
Search evaluation, citation display, permission design, report
Evidence and answer review
Teams improving analysis, reports, and review
Task design, prototype, operation logs
Review approval before task execution
Organizations with confidential or private environments
Environment proposal, model comparison, security plan, findings
Data boundary and responsibility review
Organizations expanding to multiple teams
Usage rules, training materials, evaluation criteria, roadmap
Review culture that avoids overreliance
Support literature and protocol review with evidence-aware answers.
Assist review of imaging, NGS, mass-spec, and flow cytometry results with human oversight.
Draft research meeting notes, PoC reviews, and department reports for human editing.
Organize analysis procedures, FAQs, and review criteria for education and improvement.
Review research themes, data, constraints, and field challenges.
Define success criteria, evaluation data, review flow, and risks.
Validate RAG, LLMs, agents, and access control in a small scope.
Review evidence, reproducibility, logs, and user feedback.
Prepare rollout, training materials, rules, and continuous improvement.
We build web systems for imaging, genomics, molecular, flow cytometry, and mass spectrometry data.
We include permissions, review, training, and inquiry workflows beyond PoC.
We design for explainability and human review instead of claims of automated diagnosis or guaranteed outcomes.
AI implementation support is an independent service, not an IAS add-on. When useful, IAS can connect as a multimodal research data foundation across imaging, genomics, molecular, flow cytometry, and mass spectrometry data.
No. It is an independent service for safely introducing AI into research teams. IAS can be integrated as a multimodal research data foundation when useful.
We evaluate target data, retrieval quality, evidence, review flow, permissions, operation logs, and user feedback for production decisions.
We review external LLM, private RAG, and local LLM options according to confidentiality, network, and operation requirements.
No. AI is positioned as support for research, organization, analysis assistance, and drafting, with final decisions handled by human reviewers.
Even if the use case is not fully defined, we can help identify PoC candidates and a safer implementation path in a 30-minute consultation.